A Century-Old Socialwork* Problem Solution (Jung 1921) Revisited

Abstract

This manuscript revisits a century-old Socialwork* problem: how a conjoint client-worker process can justify choices, act ethically, and remain empirically disciplined without collapsing lived meaning into mere measurement or collapsing evidence into mere narrative. The proposal is that Socialwork* requires a Cube of Consciousing (CoC) for <cCC* >as an organizing form, function, frame, and focus. CoC is defined as a six-facet structure aligned to AEIOUF: (Activities, Environment, Interactions, Objects, Users, and Feelings.) These facets are mandatory and jointly hold inner and outer observations derived from interfaces of Self and Other. The argument is developed in three steps. First, the manuscript restates Flexner (1915) as a continuing challenge about disciplinary coherence and public legitimacy. Second, Jung (1921is used to explain predictable differences in orientation, language, and urgency that otherwise appear as personal conflict or professional consistency. Third, it integrates 21st-century empiricism through AEIOUF and governance through RB rules: RB0.13 (canonical token integrity) and F16 (zero-tolerance fallacy constraints) with human intervention gates. The result is a conjoint resolution protocol that makes the process auditable: what was constructed, how options were tested, how risks were handled, and why action was justified. RRID (Benjamin, 1981) is used here as a developmental guideline mapped as a 2×2 frame. The quadrants agronomical by position: Information (top-left), Resources (bottom-left), Relationships (bottom-right). Information (top-left),,Decision Making (top-right), (RRID is used here as a developmental guideline mapped as a 2×2 frame. (Benjamin, 1981) The quadrants are-canonical by position: defined by the quadrant mapping.