Ethical Dimensions of Justice and Moral Conflict in Shakespearean Tragedies: Hamlet and King Lear
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63002/assm.405.1815Keywords:
Ethical Justice, Shakespearean Tragedy, Moral Conflict, Retribution, Comparative AnalysisAbstract
This study enticingly reconnoiters, scrutinizes, and judges the ethical dimensions of justice and moral conflict within Shakespeare’s tragedies Hamlet and King Lear, using a comparative and interpretative approach grounded in ethical literary criticism and cross-textual analysis. The analysis is guided by a flexible theoretical framework that merges normative moral theories, consisting of deontological ethics via Kant, virtue ethics via Aristotle, and consequentialism by using Mill, in addition to Paul Ricoeur’s idea of moral tragedy, post-secular thought, existential ethics, and Levinasian relational ethics. Weaving those systems collectively with close reading, the study investigates how characters steer complex ethical dilemmas, embracing justice, revenge, responsibility and moral responsibility. From a comparative perspective, King Lear’s experiences of suffering, enlightenment, and redemption are juxtaposed with Hamlet’s contemplative thought on vengeance and ethical rectitude, revealing how Shakespeare intricately constructs moral anxiety and portrays the effect of ethical decisions. Textual proof demonstrates that moral issues shape character motivations, pressure plot development, and contribute to the characters’ tragic resolutions. Therefore, underlining the iconic importance of moral inquiry within both literary and philosophical backgrounds, Shakespeare’s conception of justice appears as complex, contextually nuanced, and deeply interrelated with moral uncertainty and human unreliability.
References
Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. T. Payne.
Belsey, C. (2008). Shakespeare in theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press.
Bloom, H. (1999). Shakespeare: The invention of the human. Riverhead Books.
Booth, W. C. (1988). The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. University of California Press.
Bradley, A. C. (1991). Shakespearean tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1904)
Cavell, S. (1987). Disowning knowledge in six plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.
Cormack, B., Nussbaum, M. C., & Strier, R. (Eds.). (2013). Shakespeare and the law: A conversation among disciplines and professions. University of Chicago Press.
Critchley, S., & Webster, J. (2013). The Hamlet doctrine: Knowing too much, doing nothing. Verso.
Dollimore, J. (1996). Political Shakespeare: Essays in cultural materialism (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.
Dollimore, J. (2004). Radical tragedy: Religion, ideology and power in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries (3rd ed.). Duke University Press.
Frye, N. (1986). Northrop Frye on Shakespeare (R. Sandler, Ed.). Yale University Press.
Greenblatt, S. (2001). Hamlet in purgatory. Princeton University Press.
Greenblatt, S. (2004). Will in the world: How Shakespeare became Shakespeare. W. W. Norton & Company.
Kahn, C. (1986). The absent mother in King Lear. In M. Ferguson, M. Quilligan, & N. Vickers (Eds.), Rewriting the Renaissance (pp. 33–49). University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kerrigan, J. (1996). Revenge tragedy: Aeschylus to Armageddon. Clarendon Press.
Kott, J. (1965). Shakespeare our contemporary. Methuen & Co.
Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Machiavelli, N. (1998). The prince (Q. Skinner & R. Price, Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Ryan, K. (2001). Shakespeare (3rd ed.). Palgrave.
Seneca. (2018). Oedipus; Agamemnon; Thyestes; Hercules on Oeta; Octavia (J. G. Fitch, Ed. & Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Shakespeare, W. (1997). King Lear (R. A. Foakes, Ed.). Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Shakespeare, W. (2006). Hamlet (A. Thompson & N. Taylor, Eds.). Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Dipak Kumar Sarkar, Md. Shakil Hasan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
